HSE Global
The value of H&S investment
A more sustainable business model is attainable if boards can improve their approach to health and safety, says HSE Global’s Phil Parkes.
With New Zealand’s economy slowly recovering after a long period of financial stress, boards will need to carefully consider how to handle pressure from their shareholders for dividends against the preservation of capital as a buffer against risk or deploying capital to seize opportunities.
This may result in some difficult conversations around the board table and even more difficult conversations with shareholders.
As a starting point, shareholders have no general right to demand a dividend. Whether a dividend is declared will be determined by the board, which will include considering the size of the dividend and when it should be paid, based on the company’s profitability and financial position.
Additionally, a company must meet certain legal requirements under the Companies Act 1993 (Companies Act), including that the company remains solvent after payment of the dividend. Essentially, if paying a dividend would put a company’s financial health at risk, the company is not permitted to pay the dividend.
While shareholders do not have a right to a dividend, it is not uncommon for a company to adopt a dividend policy, which stipulates the board’s objectives in relation to dividends.
These policies can be set by the shareholders or by the board, and can vary based on a company’s financial health, growth strategy and shareholder expectations.
It is important to note that unless such policies are set out in the constitutional documents, these policies are not binding on a company and, in any event, a board would find it difficult to declare a dividend where it would risk contravention of the Companies Act.
In addition to solvency requirements, there is a direct line between a director authorising dividends and their fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of the company.
This fundamental duty will influence a director’s decision about declaring dividends. In particular, it requires directors to consider the company’s long-term health, sustainability and success when making decisions.
If directors authorise a dividend that is not legally justified or breaches the solvency test, they may be held personally liable for breach of their duties. Other consequences may include penalties, fines or other sanctions under the Companies Act, or possible derivative action from shareholders.
With boards having to consider an ever-broadening range of factors, the question of whether to declare a dividend, or use capital for other means, is becoming more and more complex.
While this is not an exhaustive list, some current trends that might be discussed by a board include:
As a consequence of the current economic climate and the increasing number of factors that boards are grappling with, the decision of whether to declare dividends is becoming a more complex and difficult exercise.
In our experience, good boards will:
Regardless of the outcome of these decisions, the potential of having some long-awaited headroom, and the problem of how to allocate it, will surely be welcomed by boards.